The Elizabeth Holmes Trial: Judge Instructs Jurors to Keep Deliberating
SAN JOSE, Calif.—A federal judge instructed jurors in the criminal-fraud trial of
Elizabeth Holmes
to continue deliberating after they said they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict on three of the 11 charges against the Theranos Inc. founder.
Jurors communicated their status with a note to the court just before 10 a.m. Monday, the seventh day of deliberations, suggesting they may have reached a unanimous verdict on the remaining eight counts.
The note marked a crucial update from the jury of eight men and four women since it was handed the case Dec. 17. After consultation with lawyers on both sides, U.S. District Judge
Edward Davila
instructed the jurors to keep deliberating and reminded them of the instructions they must follow to make their decision and that the prosecution has the burden to prove Ms. Holmes’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
“Take as much time as you need to discuss things. There is no hurry,” Judge Davila said, reading aloud what’s known as an “Allen charge” or a “dynamite charge” used to help deadlocked juries reach a verdict.
He then sent the 12 jurors back to continue deliberating, telling them to notify the court if they have additional questions.
Ms. Holmes hugged her mother and partner, Billy Evans, after the jurors left the courtroom. Her defense lawyers told the judge they preferred he didn’t read the Allen charge at risk of it being coercive to the jury.
Jurors are deliberating on 11 counts of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud pertaining to Ms. Holmes’s leadership of her defunct blood-testing startup.
(More to come)
Write to Heather Somerville at [email protected] and Sara Randazzo at [email protected]
Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
For all the latest Technology News Click Here
For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News.